Lactitol

Posted by & filed under Lactitol, Polyols.

Lactitol, a polyol (sugar alcohol), is currently used as a bulk sweetener in calorie-controlled foods. Discovered in 1920, it was first used in foods in the 1980’s. Lactitol has a clean sweet taste that closely resembles the taste profile of sucrose. It has only 40 percent of sucrose’s sweetening power. This mild sweetness makes it an ideal bulk sweetener to partner with low-calorie sweeteners, such as acesulfame K, aspartame, neotame, saccharin and sucralose. Lactitol is produced by two manufacturers. DANISCO SWEETENERS markets lactitol in both anhydrous and monohydrate forms and PURAC BIOCHEM markets several forms of lactitol under the trade name LACTY®.

Due to its stability, solubility and similar taste to sucrose, lactitol can be used in a variety of low-calorie, low-fat and/or sugar-free foods such as ice cream, chocolate, hard and soft candies, baked goods, sugar reduced preserves, chewing gums and sugar substitutes. Lactitol is manufactured by reducing the glucose part of the disaccharide lactose. Unlike the metabolism of lactose, lactitol is not hydrolyzed by lactase. It is neither hydrolyzed nor absorbed in the small intestine. Lactitol is metabolized by bacteria in the large intestine, where it is converted into biomass, organic acids, carbon dioxide and a small amount of hydrogen. The organic acids are further metabolized resulting in a caloric contribution of 2 calories per gram (carbohydrates generally have about 4 calories per gram).

A GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) affirmation petition submitted by PURAC biochem has been accepted for filing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This allows manufacturers to produce and sell foods with lactitol in the United States. Internationally, it is approved for use in many countries, including the European Union (EU), Canada, Japan, Israel and Switzerland.

Benefits of Lactitol

Sweet and clean taste: Lactitol has a clean sweet, sugar-like taste with no aftertaste. The relative sweetness of lactitol rises as its concentration in a food is increased. Its mild sweet taste allows other flavors to be clearly perceived. Lactitol is a white crystalline powder.

High quality low-calorie foods: Lactitol’s many attributes as a bulk sweetener with mild sweetness make it a versatile ingredient for high quality low-calorie, low-fat and sugar-free foods. Lactitol is not hygroscopic, meaning it will not absorb moisture into products, will maintain crispness and extend the shelf life of cookies and chewing gum. It also has similar solubility to glucose, is stable in acid and alkaline conditions and remains stable under the high temperatures of food processing. Due to lactitol’s mild sweetness profile, it can be paired with low-calorie sweeteners commonly used in today’s low-calorie, sugar-free foods (e.g. acesulfame K, aspartame, neotame, saccharin and sucralose).

Low in calories: Lactitol is not metabolized like a typical carbohydrate (or like sugar) and therefore does not contribute the usual 4 calories per gram. Lactitol is metabolized in the large intestine and yields, according to tests, only 2 calories per gram. This value has been accepted for labeling purposes in the U.S. by the FDA. The EU Nutrition Labeling Directive states that all sugar alcohols, including lactitol, have a caloric value of 2.4 calories per gram.

Improving gut health: Lactitol is fermented in the colon and consequently has beneficial effects on the colonic microflora. A reduction in the pH of the colon, along with an increase in probiotic bacteria and a significant reduction in potential pathogens emphasizes the beneficial effects of lactitol. In essence, lactitol functions as a prebiotic.

Facts About Lactitol
  • Bulk sweetener which can be blended with low-calorie sweeteners (e.g., acesulfame K, aspartame, neotame, saccharin and sucralose) and/or other polyols (e.g., sorbitol, xylitol)
  • Clean and mild sweet taste with no aftertaste
  • Reduced-calorie sweetener with 2 calories per gram
  • Potential use in a variety of low-calorie, low-fat and sugar-free foods
  • Beneficial for people with diabetes because it does not raise blood glucose or insulin levels
  • Does not contribute to the formation of dental caries
  • Functions as a prebiotic

Beneficial to People With Diabetes

As a sweetening ingredient, lactitol has a low glycemic index, does not induce an increase in blood glucose or insulin levels and contributes half the calories of most other carbohydrates (2 calories per gram). Control of blood glucose, lipids and weight are the three major goals in diabetes management today. Foods using lactitol to replace sugar can be used by people with diabetes, giving them a wider variety of low-calorie and sugar-free choices. However, people should understand that foods sweetened with lactitol contain other ingredients that contribute calories and other nutrients. These must be considered in meal planning.

Does Not Cause Dental Caries

Lactitol is not metabolized by oral bacteria which break down sugars and starches to release acids that may lead to cavities or erode tooth enamel. The usefulness of polyols, including lactitol, as alternatives to sugars and as part of a comprehensive program including proper dental hygiene has been recognized by the American Dental Association. The FDA has approved the use of a “does not promote tooth decay” health claim in labeling for sugar-free foods that contain polyols, including lactitol.

Safety

The safety of lactitol as a food additive has been substantiated by numerous animal and human studies. Safety studies in experimental animals include long-term feeding studies at high dietary levels for 2 1/2 years in rats and for 2 years in mice.

The safety research on lactitol has been reviewed by several international authoritative bodies. In April 1983, the World Health Organization’s Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) reviewed the scientific data on lactitol and allocated an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of “not specified” to lactitol. JECFA’s decisions are often adopted by many small countries, which do not have their own agencies to review food additive safety. In 1984, the Scientific Committee on Food of the European Union evaluated lactitol and stated that consumption of 20 grams per day of polyols, including lactitol, is unlikely to cause undesirable laxative symptoms. The Committee allocated lactitol an ADI “not specified.” ADI, expressed in terms of body weight, is the amount of a food additive that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without risk. An ADI “not specified” is the safest category in which JECFA can place a food additive.

In the United States, a GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) affirmation petition for the use of lactitol in chewing gum, hard and soft candy and frozen dairy desserts was accepted for filing by the Food and Drug Administration in September 1993. Once a GRAS affirmation petition has been accepted for filing, food manufacturers can use the ingredient in the applications specified in the petition.

Multiple Ingredient Approach to Calorie Control

Today, more Americans are striving to maintain a healthy lifestyle by consuming less calories and fat. To achieve today’s nutrition and health goals, Americans are continually searching for new calorie-controlled foods and beverages. Good taste remains a vital factor in consumer acceptance of new healthier foods.

Lactitol is a novel ingredient that allows food manufacturers to develop new foods that both taste good and are lower in calories, fat and/or sugar. Lactitol’s qualities as a bulk sweetener make it optimal to blend with low-calorie sweeteners that are several hundred times sweeter than sucrose (but do not provide the necessary volume). Lactitol can also be used with other bulk sweeteners or polyols. Blending two or more polyols gives food manufacturers the flexibility to take advantage of each sweetener’s individual attributes. Lactitol offers food manufacturers the beneficial characteristics of mild sweetness, stability, solubility, bulk and reduced calories.

Future

Lactitol’s unique attributes make it a versatile reduced-calorie sweetener for a wide variety of food applications from baked goods to hard and soft candy and frozen dairy desserts. With an ever growing focus on healthier eating, the demand for low-calorie foods is rising. With the relatively new introduction of lactitol, many innovative products are on the horizon.

For more information visit polyols.org.

References
European Economic Community Council (EEC). 1990. Directive on food labeling. Off. J. Eur. Communities No. L 276/40 (Oct.6).
Grenby, T.H., Phillips, A., Mistry, M.: Studies of the dental properties of lactitol compared with five other bulk sweeteners in vitro. Caries Research. 23:315-319, 1989.
Grenby, T.H., Phillips, A.: Dental and metabolic observations on lactitol in laboratory rats. British Journal of Nutrition. 61:17-24, 1989.
Grenby, T.H., Desai, T.: A trial of lactitol in sweets and its effects on human dental plaque. British Dental Journal. 164:383-387, 1988.
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, IPCS Toxicological evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: Lactitol, 27th report Geneva, WHO Food Additives Series, 1983, pp.82-94
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. PURAC biochem b.v.; Filing of petition for affirmation of GRAS status (lactitol) Federal Register, Vol. 58 No.174:47746, 1993
Van Es, A.J.H., de Groot, L., Vogt, J.E.: Energy balances of eight volunteers fed on diets supplemented with either lactitol or saccharose. British Journal of Nutrition. 56:545-554, 1986.
van Velthuijsen, J.A., Blankers, I.H.: Lactitol: A new reduced-calorie sweetener. In: Alternative Sweeteners (2ed.), L.O. Nabors & R.C. Gelardi eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc., N.Y., 1991.

Isomalt

Posted by & filed under Isomalt, Polyols.

Isomalt is a unique, excellent tasting sugar-free bulk sweetener. Because the same amount of isomalt is used in products as would be used if they were sweetened with sugar, isomalt-containing products have the same appearance and texture as those made with sugar.

Discovered in the 1960s, isomalt is made from sucrose and looks much like table sugar. It is white, crystalline and odorless. Isomalt is a mixture of two disaccharide alcohols: gluco-mannitol and gluco-sorbitol.

Isomalt has been used in the United States for several years in products such as hard candies, toffees, chewing gum, chocolates, baked goods, nutritional supplements, cough drops and throat lozenges. It has been available in Europe, however, since the early 1980s and is currently used in a wide variety of products in more than 70 countries worldwide.

Isomalt offers benefits that suit changing life-styles and contemporary guidelines for healthy diets. It enlarges food choices for the growing number of people who would like to make moderate, but not extreme, improvements in their diet. It is ideal for consumers who want to adopt a healthier lifestyle, as long as foods still taste good.

Because of its lower caloric value and other health benefits, isomalt is useful for people who are trying to reduce their total energy intake moderately while still being able to enjoy their favorite desserts, candy, and other sweetened foods occasionally as part of meals or snacks.

How Isomalt is Made

The two-step process begins with sucrose. First, an enzyme rearranges the linkage between glucose and fructose in sucrose. In the second step, two hydrogens are added to an oxygen in the fructose portion of the disaccharide. Approximately half of the fructose portion of the original disaccharide is converted to mannitol and about half of the fructose portion of the original disaccharide is converted to sorbitol. Therefore, isomalt contains two different disaccharide alcohols: gluco-mannitol and gluco-sorbitol.

The molecular changes that occur in these steps make isomalt more stable – chemically and enzymatically – than sucrose. Isomalt’s stability is the reason for many of its health benefits and the large variety of products which it can improve.

How Isomalt is Used

Besides the characteristics that result from isomalt’s volume and texture, isomalt can be heated without losing its sweetness or being broken down. Therefore, it is predominantly used in products that are boiled, baked or subjected to higher temperatures.

Isomalt absorbs very little water. Therefore, products made with it tend not to become sticky. This means that candies, for example, can be put into a packet without each being wrapped separately, a convenient and appealing attribute for environmentally conscious consumers. Another advantage, resulting from this property is that, since the products do not absorb moisture, they have a longer shelf life.

Isomalt enhances flavor transfer in foods. It dissolves more slowly in the mouth so that candies with isomalt have a longer lasting taste. Isomalt does not have the often undesired “cooling” effect of some other polyols. Its sensory properties make isomalt an excellent ingredient for candies, chocolates, baked products and flavored applications such as fruit flavored candy, coffee and chocolate.

Isomalt’s sweetening power depends on its concentration, temperature and the form of the product in which it is used. When used alone, it contributes 45% to 65% of the sweetness that would result from the same amount of sucrose.

Multiple Ingredient Usage

Isomalt is often used in combination with intense sweeteners. Isomalt gives products bulk, texture and mild sweetness, while the intense sweetener brings the level of sweetness up to what it would be if sugar were used. An additional advantage of such combined usage is that isomalt tends to mask the bitter aftertaste of some intense sweeteners. Synergistic effects in sweetening power occur when isomalt is combined with either intense sweeteners or other volume providing sweeteners.

How the Body Uses Isomalt

Isomalt, like all polyols, is a low digestible carbohydrate which is only partially digested in the intestines. In the lower part of the intestinal tract, the non-absorbed portion is metabolized by colonic bacteria.

Isomalt’s physiological characteristics are a result of this process: Isomalt does not promote tooth decay, has a very low blood glucose effect (low glycemic response), has an effect like dietary fiber in the gut and has only half of the caloric value of sucrose.

Benefits

Lower Caloric Value: For food labeling purposes in the United States, an energy value of only 2 calories per gram is used for isomalt. Isomalt’s lower caloric value is partly due to the fact that intestinal enzymes are not able to easily hydrolyze its more stable disaccharide bond. Less of it is digested and, therefore, less absorbed from the small intestine into the blood, and this happens slowly.

Supports Gut Health: Daily intake of 30 g isomalt was demonstrated to promote an increase of the “good” bacteria in the large intestine, the bifidobacteria, demonstrating the prebiotic effect of isomalt. The water-binding property of isomalt may influence the structure of the content of the gut, making it softer. If the consistency of the feces is too soft, it can be regulated by cutting down intake and allowing some time for adaptation. Like dietary fibers, isomalt is broken down by the gut bacteria to so called short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and gases. SCFA have the advantage of decreasing acidity in the large intestine and some SCFA are discussed as being beneficial for a healthy epithelium in the large intestine.

Less Dental Caries Risk: Isomalt is anti-cariogenic and does not promote dental caries, because oral bacteria cannot readily convert it into decay causing acids. Therefore, the acidic conditions that lead to tooth demineralization do not develop after consuming isomalt, as occurs after eating sugar and other fermentable carbohydrates. Furthermore, isomalt cannot be converted by oral bacteria into polyglucan, the substance from which dental plaque is synthesized.

Isomalt can help repair early dental caries lesions. Its sweet taste stimulates the production of saliva, thus reducing acidity and increasing calcium levels on the tooth surface. These changes facilitate remineralization of areas previously damaged by acidic conditions in the mouth due to fermentable carbohydrate consumption.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows manufacturers of sugar-free isomalt-containing products to make the health claim, “Does not promote dental caries,” if those products do not reduce plaque pH to less than 5.7 during or for up to 30 minutes after consumption.

Very low blood glucose and insulin response: Due to the metabolism described above, isomalt hardly influences blood glucose or insulin after intake as demonstrated in a number of studies, thus isomalt is very low glycemic. Isomalt is an ingredient, a useful tool within the total diet, that can contribute to providing low glycemic products to consumers interested in this health benefit. In particular those consumers are addressed that are interested in a healthy lifestyle (management and prevention of obesity, diabetes etc., being on a ‘low carb diet.’) There is a growing body of evidence that shows that a low glycemic diet can help in the management and prevention of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Facts About Isomalt
  • Isomalt is made from sugar
  • Isomalt is used in a variety of foods, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals
  • Provides the taste and texture of sugar
  • Synergistic with other sweeteners
  • Provides at most 2 calories per gram Does not promote dental caries
  • Does not increase blood glucose or insulin levels

Regulatory Status

A petition to affirm the GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status of isomalt has been accepted for filing by the FDA. Isomalt has been used in the United States since 1990. It is marketed in the U.S. by Palatinit of America, Inc. and Beneo Group.

The World Health Organization’s Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) evaluated the safety of isomalt and concluded that there is no need for a numeric (limited) acceptable daily intake (ADI). JECFA established an ADI for isomalt of “not specified,” the safest category in which JECFA can place a food ingredient.

For more information visit polyols.com.

References
Augustin LS et al; Glycemic index in chronic disease: a review. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2002) 56, 1049-1071
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Life Science Research Office; The evaluation of the energy of certain sugar alcohols used as food ingredients, Bethesda, Maryland, June 1994
Food and Drug Administration, Health claims: dietary sugar alcohols and dental caries, Federal Register 61(165):43433-43445, August 12, 1996 and 21 CFR § 101.80
Gostner A. et al; Colonic effect of the polyol isomalt in humans.Congress of the American Gastroenterology Association, May 2004
Ludwig D.S.; The Glycemic Index. Physiological Mechanisms Relating to Obesity, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA, 287 (2002) 2414-2423
McNutt, K. and Sentko, A., Sugar replacers: A growing group of sweeteners in the United States, Nutr. Today, 31(6):255-261, 1996
Pometta D. et al; Effects of a 12-week Administration of Isomalt (Palatinit®) on Metabolic Control in Type-II Diabetics. Akt. Ernaehr. 10 (1985) 174-177
Sydney University’s Glycaemic Index Research Service, Glycaemic Index Report – Isomalt; Report July 2002
Thiébaud, D. et al, Comparative study of isomalt and sucrose by means of continuous indirect calorimetry, Metabolism 33:808-813, 1984
Willibald-Ettle, I. and Schiweck, H., Properties and applications of isomalt and other bulk sweeteners, in Advances in Sweeteners, Ed. T.H. Grenby, pp.134-149, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1996

Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysates

Posted by & filed under Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysates, Sugar Substitutes.

Hydrogenated starch hydrolysates (HSH), including hydrogenated glucose syrups, maltitol syrups, and sorbitol syrups, are a family of products found in a wide variety of foods. They serve a number of functional roles, including use as bulk sweeteners, viscosity or bodying agents, humectants, crystallization modifiers, cryoprotectants and rehydration aids. They also can serve as sugar-free carriers for flavors, colors and enzymes. HSH were developed by a Swedish company in the 1960’s and have been used by the food industry for many years, especially in confectionery products.

HSH are produced by the partial hydrolysis of corn, wheat or potato starch and subsequent hydrogenation of the hydrolysate at high temperature under pressure. The end product is an ingredient composed of sorbitol, maltitol and higher hydrogenated saccharides (maltitriitol and others). By varying the conditions and extent of hydrolysis, the relative occurrence of various mono-, di-, oligo- and polymeric hydrogenated saccharides in the resulting product can be obtained. A wide range of polyols (also known as sugar alcohols) that can satisfy varied requirements with respect to different levels of sweetness, viscosity and humectancy can, therefore, be produced.

The term “hydrogenated starch hydrolysate” can correctly be applied to any polyol produced by the hydrogenation of the saccharide products of starch hydrolysis. In practice, however, certain polyols such as sorbitol, mannitol and maltitol are referred to by their common chemical names. “Hydrogenated starch hydrolysate” is more commonly used to describe the broad group of polyols that contain substantial quantities of hydrogenated oligo- and polysaccharides in addition to any monomeric or dimeric polyols (sorbitol/mannitol or maltitol, respectively).

The broad term HSH does not differentiate polyols having, for example, different levels of sweetness nor does it identify the principle polyol in the HSH. Common names for major HSH subgroups have, therefore, been developed. These common names are generally based on the most prevalent polyol comprising the HSH. For example, polyols containing sorbitol as the majority (50 percent or more) component are called sorbitol syrups; those with maltitol as the majority component are called maltitol syrups, maltitol solutions or hydrogenated glucose syrups. Polyols that do not contain a specific polyol as the majority component continue to be referred to by the general term “hydrogenated starch hydrolysate.”

In the United States, HSH are provided by three manufacturers; Ingredion, Roquette America, Inc. and Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM). Product examples of maltitol syrups include Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ MaltiSweet ™ 3145 which is approximately 65 percent maltitol and Hystar® 5875 which is 60 percent maltitol and Roquette’s Lycasin® 80/55 which is 55 percent maltitol. Sorbitol syrups include Roquette’s 70/100 which is 75 percent sorbitol, Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ Sorbo 70% and A-625 which contain 70 percent sorbitol and ADM’s sorbitol syrup, called Sorbitol Solution, Noncrystallizing, NF, which is 70 percent sorbitol. Examples of products called by the general term HSH include Roquette’s 75/400 and Corn Products Specialty Ingredients’ Hystar® 33/75. Corn Products Specialty Ingredients also markets Liquid HSH (Stabilite® ) and a powdered HSH (Stabilite® SD) through its joint venture with Grain Processing Corporation, Innova.

Functional Advantages

HSH are outstanding humectants which do not crystallize, enabling the production of sugar-free confections with the same cooking and handling systems used to produce sugar candies. These products are used extensively in confections, baked goods, a broad range of other foods, dentifrices and mouthwashes.

HSH are nutritive sweeteners that provide 40 to 90 percent of the sweetness of sugar. Being polyols, HSH are not sugars and are used to provide sweetness, texture and bulk to a variety of sugarless products. Unlike sugars, HSH are not readily fermented by oral bacteria and are used to formulate sugarless products that do not promote dental caries.

HSH are also more slowly absorbed in the digestive tract. A portion of HSH may be enzymatically hydrolyzed in the body to sorbitol, maltitol and glucose, however, this process is slow. Therefore, HSH have a reduced glycemic potential relative to glucose for individuals with and without diabetes. Since HSH are more slowly absorbed, a portion of HSH in a food reaches the lower digestive tract where it is metabolized by naturally occurring colonic bacteria. This results in a reduction in the available calories and permits its use as a reduced calorie alternative to sugar.

Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) affirmation petitions for HSH have been accepted for filing by the Food and Drug Administration. This allows manufacturers to produce and sell foods containing these sweeteners in the United States.

Facts About Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysates
  • Pleasant tasting bulk sweeteners that blend well with other sweeteners and are synergistic with low-calorie sweeteners (e.g., acesulfame K, aspartame, neotame, saccharin and sucralose)
  • Blend well with flavors and can mask unpleasant off-flavors
  • Reduced calorie alternatives to sugar, having not more than 3 calories per gram
  • Used in a variety of products; exceptionally well suited for sugar-free candies because they do not crystallize
  • Do not contribute to the formation of dental caries
  • May be useful as alternatives to sugar for people with diabetes on the advice of their physician

Does Not Promote Tooth Decay

Polyols, including HSH, are resistant to metabolism by oral bacteria that break down sugars and starches to release acids that may lead to cavities or erode tooth enamel. They are, therefore, non-cariogenic. The usefulness of polyols as alternatives to sugars and as a part of a comprehensive program including proper dental hygiene has been recognized by the American Dental Association.

Use in the Diet of People with Diabetes

Control of blood glucose, lipids and weight are the three major goals in diabetes management today. HSH absorption is slow and incomplete. Therefore, the rise in blood glucose and insulin response associated with the ingestion of glucose is significantly reduced when HSH are used as alternative sweeteners. The reduced caloric value (75 percent, or less, that of sugar) of HSH is consistent with the objective of weight control. Products in which HSH replace sugar may, therefore, be of use providing a wider variety of reduced calorie and sugar-free choices to people with diabetes.

Recognizing that diabetes is complex and requirements for its management may vary between individuals, the usefulness of HSH should be discussed between individuals and their physicians. Foods sweetened with HSH products may contain other ingredients that also contribute calories and other nutrients. These must be considered in meal planning.

Reduced-Calorie Alternatives to Sugar

Absorption of HSH by the body is slow, allowing a portion of HSH to reach the large intestine where metabolism yields fewer calories. Therefore, unlike sugar that contributes 4 calories per gram, the caloric contribution of HSH is not more than 3 calories per gram. For a product to qualify as “reduced calorie” in the United States, it must have at least a 25 percent reduction in calories. HSH may, therefore, be of use in formulating reduced calorie food products.

The lower caloric value of HSH and other polyols is recognized in other countries. For example, the European Union has provided a Nutritional Labeling Directive stating that all polyols, including HSH, have a caloric value of 2.4 calories per gram.

Safety

The safety of HSH products and their components is substantiated by a broad range of safety studies in man and animals, including long term feeding, multigeneration reproduction and teratology studies.

The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) has reviewed the safety information and concluded that maltitol syrups are safe. JECFA established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for “maltitol syrup” of “not specified,” meaning no limits are placed on its use. An ADI of “not specified” is the safest category in which JECFA can place a food ingredient. JECFA’s decisions are often adopted by many small countries that do not have their own agencies to review food additive safety. In 1984, the Scientific Committee for Food of the European Union evaluated maltitol syrups and concluded it was not necessary to set an ADI for maltitol syrups.

In the United States, Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) petitions for HSH products have been accepted for filing. Once a GRAS affirmation petition has been accepted for filing, food manufacturers may use the ingredient. Products from the HSH family are approved in many other countries, including Canada, Japan and Australia.

Multiple Ingredient Approach to Calorie Control

HSH, although less sweet than sucrose, blend well with other sweeteners and flavors and can mask unpleasant off-flavors such as bitter notes. HSH products are synergistic with low-calorie sweeteners. Applications for HSH include confectionaries, baked goods, icings and frozen desserts. In baked goods, for example, HSH products not only offer sweetness but also moisture control, texture improvement, crystallization inhibition, less browning (allowing less chance of burning), stability improvement with extended shelf life and flavor improvement.

Future

Health conscious Americans continue to demand additional good-tasting products with less calories and fat. A wide variety of low-calorie and reduced-calorie ingredients can provide products with improved taste and texture, increased stability and more choices for the consumer. The availability of various low-calorie and reduced-calorie ingredients allows food manufacturers to choose the most appropriate ingredient, or combination of ingredients, for a given product. Recent research shows that more than l00 million Americans consume low-calorie products. Over half of these consumers would like additional low-calorie products to be available. The primary interest is in desserts and sweets, including baked goods, candy, chocolates and ice cream. HSH can be helpful in making many of these products possible.

For more information visit polyols.org.

References
Commission of the European Communities. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food concerning sweeteners. Sixteenth Series. Report EUR 10210 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1985.
Eberhardt, L. Hydrogenated Starch Hydrolysates and Maltitol Syrups. In: Alternative Sweeteners, Third Edition, Lyn O’Brien Nabors, ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001.
European Economic Community Council (EEC). 1990. Directive on food labeling. Official Journal of the European Communities. No. L 276/40 (Oct. 6).
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. The evaluation of the energy of certain polyols used as food ingredients. June 1994. (unpublished)
Havenaar, R. Dental advantages of some bulk sweeteners in laboratory animal trials. In: Developments in Sweeteners–3, T.H. Grenby, ed., Elsevier-Applied Science Publishers, London and New York, 1987.
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: maltitol and maltitol syrup. Forty-first report. WHO Technical Report Series 837, pp. 16-17. Geneva, 1993.`
Modderman, J.P. Safety assessment of hydrogenated starch hydrolysates. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 18:80-114, 1993.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Lonza, Inc.; Filing of petition for affirmation of GRAS status (hydrogenated starch hydrolysate). Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 68:12212, April 9, 1986.
U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Roquette Corp.; Filling of petition for affirmation of GRAS status (hydrogenated glucose sirup). Federal Register, Vol. 49, No. 39:7153, February 27, 1984.
Wheeler, M.L., et al. Metabolic response to oral challenge of hydrogenated starch hydrolysate versus glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 13:733-740, 1990.

Fat Replacers

Posted by & filed under Fat Replacers.

Reducing dietary fat is a major dietary goal for many consumers. With encouragement from health groups and government agencies, the public continues to choose foods and beverages naturally low in fat, as well as the fast-growing array of prepared reduced-fat and non-fat foods and beverages. The development and use of a wide variety of ingredients known as fat replacers are making many of these light products possible.

What is Fat?

Fat, like protein and carbohydrate, is a principal and essential component of the diet. Fat is the body’s most concentrated source of energy. Some dietary fat is vital to enable the body to function properly. Fat is responsible for transporting “fat-soluble” vitamins A, D, E and K.

Dietary fats also are a source of fatty acids, including essential fatty acids which are necessary to assure good health. Essential fatty acids must be obtained from dietary sources (primarily vegetable oils) because the body cannot make them.

Fatty acids are separated by their structure as either saturated, monounsaturated or polyunsaturated. Although naturally occurring fats in food are a mixture of many different fatty acids, fats can be characterized by their origin:

Saturated fats are mainly found in foods of animal origin. These include the fats in whole milk, cream, cheese, butter, meat and poultry. Saturated fats also can be found in large amounts in some vegetable products, such as cocoa butter, coconut oil and palm oil. Saturated fats are usually solid at room temperature.

Monounsaturated fats are found primarily in plants, but also are found in animals. Olive, peanut and canola oil are common examples of fats high in monounsaturated fatty acids. Also, most margarines and hydrogenated vegetable shortenings tend to be high in monounsaturated fatty acids. Monounsaturated fats are liquid at room temperature.

Polyunsaturated fats are found mostly in plants. Sunflower, corn, soybean, cotton seed and safflower oils are vegetable fats that contain a relatively high proportion of polyunsaturated fats. Margarines with vegetable oil as the primary ingredient, and some fish, also are sources of polyunsaturated fats. Polyunsaturated fats usually are liquid at room temperature.

Sources of Fat in the Food Supply

Fat is found at some level in most foods. The following chart from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) indicates the major sources of fat in the U.S. food supply.

Food Group% of Total Fat in Food Supply
Meat, poultry and fish30
Grain products25
Milk and milk products18
Fats and Oils
(mainly tablespreads and salad dressings)
11
Vegetables9
Other7

Why Reduce Fat Intake?

Most consumers enjoy the taste, texture and aroma fat gives to foods. At nine calories per gram, fat is the most concentrated source of calories in the diet; protein and carbohydrates contribute approximately four calories per gram.

Fat consumption among Americans is estimated at 34 percent of total caloric intake. This level of fat intake is considered too high by many public health organizations, which have agreed that 30 percent or less of total calories should be derived from fat, and no more than 10 percent from saturated fat.

The Surgeon General’s Report on Nutrition and Health states: “High intake of total dietary fat is associated with increased risk for obesity, some types of cancer, and possibly gallbladder disease. Epidemiologic, clinical, and animal studies provide strong and consistent evidence for the relationship between saturated fat intake, high blood cholesterol, and increased risk for coronary heart disease. Excessive saturated fat consumption is the major dietary contributor to total blood cholesterol levels.”

In addition to the Surgeon General, the National Academy of Sciences, American Heart Association, National Cholesterol Education Program, American Cancer Society, American Dietetic Association, National Institutes of Health, USDA and the Department of Health and Human Services are among the many health and government authorities that advocate reduction of dietary fat for most consumers. Generally, these groups recommend that even healthy consumers would benefit from reducing fat to no more than 30 percent of total calories.

For certain population subgroups (e.g., children two years old and younger and the elderly) fat reduction may not be appropriate. For others, such as persons with serum cholesterol in the “high risk” category, further dietary fat reduction may be necessary.

Consumers Demand Low-Fat Options

Considering an average consumption of 34 percent of calories from fat, decreasing intake to 30 percent may not seem a monumental task. However, for many people it is exceedingly difficult. To meet this dietary goal, people need to significantly modify their diets — e.g., choose leaner meats, skin poultry and fish, select low-fat/non-fat dairy products and dressings, and limit fried foods. Of course, consumers’ strong desire for high-fat foods makes this difficult. In fact, diet and obesity experts have found that consumers have difficulty maintaining diets once their fat consumption dips below 30 percent of total calories.

Nevertheless, millions of consumers are trying to change their “high-fat” ways. A national survey conducted in 2000 by Booth Research Services for the Calorie Control Council revealed 188 million adult Americans (88 percent of the adult U.S. population) consume low- or reduced-fat foods and beverages. Another Council survey shows that two-thirds of adults believe there is a need for food ingredients which can replace the fat in food products. According to Prepared Foods, more than 2,000 new low- or reduced-fat products have been introduced since 1997.

The food industry has responded to consumer demand by offering an ever-increasing variety of low-fat eating choices. These rich, creamy reduced-fat foods are the result of various new, and existing, food technologies used to replace some or most of the fat without sacrificing the taste and texture consumers desire. Some of the more traditional examples include: replacing whole milk with skim milk in “ice creams,” using leaner meats in frozen entrees, baking snack foods instead of frying and replacing the fat in some products with water or air.

Many Reduced-Fat Products Possible With Fat Replacers

Many good-tasting, low-fat foods are available today thanks to the growing use of one or more low-calorie fat replacers. Most fat replacers currently in use are reformulations of previously used food ingredients. Additionally, the food industry has formulated a variety of new fat replacer ingredients by using innovative technologies.

The type of fat replacer(s) used in a product depends largely on which of the complex and diverse properties of fat are being duplicated. In addition to flavor, palatability and creaminess, fats provide an essential lubricating action. In fried foods, fats and oils transmit heat rapidly and uniformly and provide crisping. Thus, the particular desired functions of fat needed to produce an acceptable product — flavor/texture, lubrication, volume/bulk, or heat transfer — determine which ingredient(s) and processing techniques are employed.

The ideal fat replacer(s) recreates all the attributes of fat, while also significantly reducing fat and calorie content. The challenge for food processors is to identify the fat replacer(s) that works best for a given product.

Fat replacement may require several ingredients to replace the functionality of fat. A “systems approach” is, therefore, sometimes employed. In the systems approach, a variety of synergistic components are used to achieve the functional and sensory characteristics of the full-fat product. Combinations of ingredients are used to compensate for specific functions of the fat being replaced. These combinations may include proteins, starches, dextrins, maltodextrins, fiber, emulsifiers and flavoring agents. Some fat replacers are now available that are themselves a combination or blend of ingredients (for example, one ingredient currently in use is a combination of whey, emulsifiers, modified food starch, fiber and gum).

The public will benefit most from a wide variety of ingredients used as fat replacers in order to capitalize on the unique qualities of each in the most appropriate product applications. The result is a greater variety of rich, creamy, good-tasting low-fat foods and beverages for consumers to enjoy.

Where Do Fat Replacers Come From?

The fat replacers developed to date generally fall into one of three categories:

  • carbohydrate-based
  • protein-based
  • fat-based

Many of the low-fat products introduced in recent years contain carbohydrate-based fat replacers (e.g., cellulose, maltodextrins, gums, starches, fiber and polydextrose). Carbohydrates have been used safely for many years as thickeners and stabilizers. These ingredients are also effective fat replacers in many formulated foods, including heat applications. They are not suitable for frying foods.

Protein-based fat replacers have tremendous potential for use in a variety of products, especially frozen and refrigerated products. Although protein-based fat replacers are not suitable for frying foods, they can be used in many heat applications (e.g., cream soups, pasteurized products, baked goods).

Scientists have been able to chemically alter fatty acids to provide fewer or no calories, makingfat-based fat replacers possible. Some fat-based fat replacers actually pass through the body virtually unabsorbed (e.g., olestra). These ingredients have the advantage of heat stability and offer excellent versatility. Some may be used in frying; others as cocoa butter substitutes.

Labeling Reduced-Fat Products

According to a 1998 survey conducted for the Calorie Control Council, 54 percent of consumers find “reduced in both fat and calories” an appealing descriptor when selecting light products. Food labels indicating a reduction in fat are, therefore, important to both the consumer and the food industry.

U.S. food labeling regulations implemented in 1994 provide for a number of claims indicating a reduction in fat, calories or both.

Fat Claims

  • Fat-free: less than 0.5g fat/serving and /reference amount
  • Low-fat: 3g or less fat/reference serving size
  • Reduced or less fat: 25% or less fat/serving than regular (full fat) product
  • Percent fat free: Based on 100g, when product meets the definition of low fat or is 100% fat free, claim can be made when a product meets the definition of fat free and contains no added fat

For meat, poultry, seafood and game meats:

  • Lean: less than 10g fat, 4.5g or less saturated fat and less than 95mg cholesterol/reference serving and /100g
  • Extra Lean: less than 5g fat, less than 2g saturated fat and less than 95 mg cholesterol/reference serving and /100g

Calorie Claims

  • Calorie-free: less than 5 calories/serving and /reference amount
  • Low-calorie: 40 or less calories/reference serving size
  • Reduced or fewer calories: 25% or less calories/serving than regular product

Calorie and Fat Claims

Light: 1/3 fewer calories or 1/2 the fat of the reference food. (If the food derives 50% or more of its calories from fat, the fat must be reduced by 50%.)

The Role of Fat Replacers in Healthy Diets

The age of reduced-fat and fat-free options is upon us. Fat replacers have opened the door for a new generation of reduced-fat foods that have the taste and texture of the high-fat foods consumers enjoy, but without unnecessary calories, cholesterol or fat.

As the American Dietetic Association has stated, “Fat replacements provide an opportunity for individuals to reduce intake of high-fat foods and enjoy reduced-fat formulations of familiar foods while preserving basic food selection patterns…. Indeed, many of the fat replacements in use today can be incorporated into foods that reflect the changing tastes of Americans. Traditional and new ingredients and technologies provide flavorful, satisfying foods, such as salad and cooking oils, cheeses, ice creams, bakery products, and salty snacks and crackers, that are reduced in fat or contain no fat.”

When limiting dietary fat, consumers still need to satisfy their basic nutritional needs. No product is a panacea. Additional reduced-fat products will not replace a person’s need for moderation and good nutrition. However, they do provide palatable alternatives which can make the difficult task of compliance with a reduced-fat and/or reduced-calorie diet easier. Thus, when incorporated into an overall balanced, nutritious diet, reduced-fat foods and beverages can play an important role in helping consumers reach and maintain their goal of reducing consumption of dietary fat, cholesterol and calories.

References
Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No 255. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 1994.
Bennett, C.J., “Formulating Low-Fat Foods with Good Taste.” Cereal Foods World. June: 429-32, 1992.
Borrud, L. G., Tippett, K. S. and Mickle, S. J., “Food Sources of Fat in USDA’s Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals 1989-91.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Presented at American Public Health Association 122nd Annual Meeting, November 3, 1994.
“Easy Food Tips for Heart-Healthy Eating.” American Heart Association brochure. 1994.
Glueck, Charles J., et al, “Dietary Fat Substitutes.” Nutrition Research. Vol. 14:10, 1605-1619, 1994.
LaBarge, Robert G., “Other Low Calorie Ingredients: Fat and Oil Substitutes.” In Alternative Sweeteners (second edition), Lyn O’Brien Nabors and Robert C. Gelardi (eds.), Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 1991.
Light Products Survey, Booth Research Services, Inc. For the Calorie Control Council, Atlanta, GA (unpublished), 1995, 1998, 2000.
McDowell, M. A., Briefel R. R., et al. Energy and Macronutrient Intakes of Persons Ages 2 Months and Over in the United States: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988-91. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics; No 255. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1994.
New Product News/GNPD Staff. “A Strong Prelude.” Prepared Foods. April 2000.
O’Donnell, Claudia D. “Starter Formulas and Low-Fat Foods: A Winning Combination – The 1995 Prepared Foods Guide to Fat Substitution.” Prepared Foods. December: 23-39, 1994.
“Position of The American Dietetic Association: Fat Replacements.” Journal of The American Dietetic Association, Vol. 91:10, 1991.
“Position of The American Dietetic Association: Fat Replacers.” Journal of The American Dietetic Association, Vol. 98:4, 1998.
Przybyla, Ann E., “Formulating Healthy Foods.” Food Engineering. Vol. 62:2, 49-59, February 1990.
Stehlin, Dori, “A Little ‘Lite’ Reading.” FDA Consumer. May 1993.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans,”  Fifth edition, Home and Garden Bulletin No 232, 1990.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. “The Surgeon General’s Report on Nutrition and Health.” DHHS Publication No. 88-50211, 1988.
Ward, Florian and Andon, Stephen, “The Use of Gums in Bakery Foods.” AIB Technical Bulletin, Vol XV:4, April, 1993.
Whitney, E. N., Cataldo, C. B. and Rogers, S.E., Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition, Second Edition. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN, 1987.

Probiotics 3

Posted by & filed under Probiotics, Statements.

Continued from Probiotics and Prebiotics As Ingredients in Functional Foods

Polydextrose is a highly branched polymer of glucose. Its unique arrangement of glycosidic linkages makes it resistant to hydrolysis by human digestive enzymes.  After ingestion it passes intact into the colon where it is partially fermented by the colonic microflora.  In this way polydextrose contributes an energy value of one calorie per gram.  It is the preferred speciality carbohydrate for a wide variety of processed food applications including baked goods, confectionery, dairy products and beverages.  Its relatively high molecular weight and slow fermentation rate contribute to polydextrose being very well tolerated at typical use rates (Flood et al, 2004).

Polydextrose is well established as a dietary fibre and complies with the recently published CODEX Alimentarius fibre definition (Anon, 2005).  Human intervention studies, combined with in vitro and metabolism data, have demonstrated that polydextrose also functions well as a prebiotic, sustaining its impact throughout the colon.

Jie et al (2000) conducted a double blind intervention study involving 120 healthy males.  This demonstrated that polydextrose enhanced both bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli in a dose dependent manner with the effect being seen with a dose as low as 4 grams per day. Increasing doses of polydextrose resulted in a reduction in fecal pH, indicative of a shift from proteolytic to saccharolytic fermentation.  The lower pH serves to inhibit pathogen growth. Fecal butyrate was also enhanced in a dose-dependent manner.

The bifidogenic effect of polydextrose was confirmed in a recent human intervention study in which polydextrose at 5 grams per day was combined with a probiotic. An almost 100 fold increase in bifidobacteria was seen from a starting level of 107 (Tiihonen et al, in press).

Colon simulation work has shown that polydextrose is fermented throughout the colon and is particularly efficient at mediating a prebiotic effect in the distal colon, where the potential for disease and disorder is particularly high (Probert et al, 2004)Ishizuka et al (2003), using a rat model, showed that polydextrose considerably reduced the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the presence of a carcinogen.  The effect was most pronounced in the rectum where the reduction was up to 65%.  The authors concluded that ingestion of polydextrose may prevent colorectal carcinogenesis.

A study by Hara et al (2000) showed that dietary polydextrose increased calcium absorption and bone mineralization in rats.  The effect may partly have been due to colonic acidification which would be expected to increase calcium solubility.  However, the main positive effect was, unexpectedly, seen in the small intestine.

Fermentation of polydextrose has beneficial effects for mucosal functions.  Enhanced butyrate production serves as an important energy source, not only for epithelial cells, but also for mucosal immune cells.  Polydextrose has been shown to increase production of immunoglobulin A (IgA) in the large intestine of rats and a synergistic effect was seen with a polydextrose:lactitol combination.

Balancing immune responses in the large intestine is especially important for reducing the risk of colon cancer development.  A possible mechanism for reduction in cancer development involves the regulation of mucosal gene expression.  Over-expression of the cyclo-oxygenase 2 (cox-2) gene is related to early stages of colon cancer development and chronic inflammatory diseases in the intestine.  Mäkivuokko et al (2005) combined two different in vitro systems, namely a four-stage simulator of colonic fermentation and a cell-culture based model of human intestinal epithelial function, in order to study the effects of polydextrose on colon cancer development.  A dose-dependent decreasing effect on cox-2 expression was observed in Caco-2 cells (a human colon cancer cell line).  This reduction of cox-2 expression associated with the colonic fermentation of polydextrose further suggests a protective role of polydextrose against colon cancer.  This study is a good example of the emerging science of nutrigenomics – the impact of nutrition on gene expression.

Efforts are ongoing to further elucidate the role of polydextrose in gut health.


Probiotics 2

Posted by & filed under Probiotics, Statements.

Continued from Probiotics and Prebiotics As Ingredients in Functional Foods

Since lactitol can pass the upper gastrointestinal tract without being hydrolyzed and absorbed, it is capable of promoting the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli in the colon.  The intestinal bacteria ferment lactitol, resulting in the establishment of an acidic environment in the colon due to the formation of short chain fatty acids.  At these acidic conditions, beneficial bacteria, better known as probiotics, grow in preference over disease causing organisms or pathogens with proteolytic activity such as Enterobacteria and Enterococci (Scevola et al.,1993a,b;  Balongue et al., 1997; Lebek and Luginbühl, 1989; Ravelli et al.,1995).  As a result, the production of circulating levels of NH3 and toxic microbial substances by the proteolytic bacteria will be reduced, of which the clinical utility is the treatment of the liver disorder (Blanc et al., 1992).

Probiotics like Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli can be delivered also proactively to the host by consuming for example cultured dairy products.  However, to be able to consume the probiotics, it is necessary that they survive the shelf life of the carrier product. The addition of lactitol to a fermented milk product has shown to improve the survival of Bifidobacteria (patent 11-113484).  So, lactitol improves not only host health, also a food product might benefit from the addition of lactitol.


faq2Do you have questions about low-calorie sweeteners? Want to learn more about maintaining a healthy lifestyle? You asked and we listened. Our resident Registered Dietitians answered the most popular questions about low-calorie sweeteners.

Media Contacts

For media inquiries please reach out to any of the below contacts: